<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unus et Omnes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://taylorempireairways.com/2007/03/unus-et-omnes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://taylorempireairways.com/2007/03/unus-et-omnes/</link>
	<description>The best Canadian Air Line</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:59:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Taylor</title>
		<link>http://taylorempireairways.com/2007/03/unus-et-omnes/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylor-company.net/?p=459#comment-439</guid>
		<description>I strongly suspect it is an admirable but misguided sense of objectivity on their part.  They surmise -- correctly -- that widespread reporting of the incident would probably create a public consensus for action and baying for blood.  So it&#039;s back-burnered.
The problem is that sometimes, it&#039;s entirely appropriate for nations to extract their pound of flesh from each other.  I happen to think it would be highly appropriate in this case.  But I imagine a lot of newsroom editors outside the UK would disagree.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly suspect it is an admirable but misguided sense of objectivity on their part.  They surmise &#8212; correctly &#8212; that widespread reporting of the incident would probably create a public consensus for action and baying for blood.  So it&#8217;s back-burnered.<br />
The problem is that sometimes, it&#8217;s entirely appropriate for nations to extract their pound of flesh from each other.  I happen to think it would be highly appropriate in this case.  But I imagine a lot of newsroom editors outside the UK would disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kateland</title>
		<link>http://taylorempireairways.com/2007/03/unus-et-omnes/comment-page-1/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>Kateland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://taylor-company.net/?p=459#comment-438</guid>
		<description>Great post Chris, and of course your right, but you know, I find it incredible how little media play this story has been gettting. I really did expect to see it splashed across each of the dailies in TO....apparently its not that big deal of a story....puzzling, truly puzzling.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Chris, and of course your right, but you know, I find it incredible how little media play this story has been gettting. I really did expect to see it splashed across each of the dailies in TO&#8230;.apparently its not that big deal of a story&#8230;.puzzling, truly puzzling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

